Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1792/2025bail granted

Rambabu Kumar @ Rambabu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-19Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1792 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- BAIRGACHHAI District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Rambabu Kumar @ Rambabu Paswan S/o Deo Shankar Paswan Resident of Village- Rukundpur, Ward No 05, PS - Tisiauta, District- Vaishali 2.

Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet S/o Yogendra Paswan Resident of Village- Rukundpur, Ward No 05, PS - Tisiauta, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bairgachhi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2024 dated 29.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 1018.500 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the pickup van.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner no. 1 is the driver and the petitioner no. 2 is the cleaner of the said vehicle. The petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1792 of 2025(2) dt.19-02-2025 2/2 have no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 30.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Araria in connection with Bairgachhi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T