← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1975/2017withdrawn

Gajendra Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2026-01-06Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1975 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Gajendra Singh and Ors Son of Late Sahdeo Singh, resident of Village and P.O Lahsuna, P.S. Masaurhi, District- Patna.

2.

Ramesh Kumar, Son of Late Ram Prasad Singh, Resident of VillageMurtazapur, P.O. Masathu, P.S. Belchhi, District- Patna. 3.

Sanju Devi, Wife of Gajendra Singh, Resident of Village and P.O- Lahsuna, P.S Masaurhi, District- Patna.

4.

Poonam Kumari, Wife of Ramesh Kumar, Resident of Village- Murtazapur, P.O. Masathu, P.S. Belchhi, District- Patna.

5.

Jaimanti Devi, Widoe of Late Chandradeo Singh, resident of Village Lahsuna, P.S- Masaurhi, District- Patna.

6.

Smt. Sumi Rekha Devi, Wife of Suresh Prasad, Resident of Village Murtazapur, P.O. Masuthu, P.S. Belchhi, District- Patna. 7.

Akash Deep, son of Sri Gajendra Singh, resident of Village Lahsuna, P.S. Masaurhi, District- Patna.

8.

Chameli Devi, Wife Of Late Ram Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Murtazapur, P.O. Masuthu, P.S. Belchhi, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

3.

The S.D.O. Patna.

4.

The Circle Officer, Sampatchak, Patna-7.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Naresh Prasad, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam- Aag12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present application has been preferred: for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamaus for direction to the respondents not trying to disturb and dispossess the petitioners from their land

Patna High Court CWJC No.1975 of 2017(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/2 purchased through various registered sale deeds.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition.

3. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U