Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1086 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2019 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR S/o Nand Kishor Mahto R/o village- Pachai Mubarak, P.S.- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant has alleged that while he went to sleep after parking his motorcycle outside his house, same was stolen by unidentified thieves.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on his own confession made in Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No.198/2019 and stolen motorcycle was not recovered from his possession. Petitioner is in custody since 27.04.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1086 of 2020(2) dt.20-01-2020 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 195/2019 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T