Md. Eqbal Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1157 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Eqbal Ahmad Son of Late Md. Yusuf, Resident of Mohalla Indrapuri Colony, Raja Bazar, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Under Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Principal, Patna Medical College and Hospital, District Patna, Bihar 6.

The Superintendent, Patna Medical College and Hospital, District Patna, Bihar.

7.

Professor cum Head of Department, Department of Surgery, Patna Medical College and Hospital, District Patna, Bihar.

8.

Dr. Ravindra Prasad, fathers name not known to the petitioner, Professor, Department of Surgery, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, District Patna, Bihar.

9.

Dr. Vinod Kumar, fathers name not known to the petitioner, Professor, Department of Surgery, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, District Patna, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Kumar Alok, SC-7 For the Pvt. Resp/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-11-2025 Learned Advocate for the respective parties are present.

2. This matter has been listed under the heading "To be Mentioned" on a motion made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1157 of 2024(4) dt.13-11-2025 2/2

3. At the outset, Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, learned Advocate for the petitioner fairly submitted that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and, as such, the matter has become infructuous.

4. In view thereof, the present writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U