← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4094/2023rejected

Ujjwal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-08Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4094 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-575 Year-2022 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== UJJWAL KUMAR S/O RAMADHAR SAH Resident of village- Chapra Nagar, P.S.- Chapra Nagar, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nalin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 575 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, on 19.10.2022 while the informant along with his family members was going to Chapra by a tempo, meanwhile, four miscreants came and intercepted them. During this incident, accused miscreants robbed total 41 kg silver ornaments, worth of Rs. 13 lakh which was kept in trolley bag. It is further alleged that the miscreants also assaulting the informant and his family members by means of knife.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4094 of 2023(3) dt.08-05-2023 2/3 petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. The petitioner is not named in FIR rather he has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused namely, Amarnath Mahto, which is inadmissible in the eye of law. It is further submitted that neither the petitioner was put on TI Parade nor any seized material has been identified properly. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.10.2022.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that the petitioner confessed his guilt in his self confessional statement also and at the instance of him, huge quantity of silver ornaments i.e. 5.7 kg recovered from house of the petitioner, which was alleged to be looted article. A tempo bearing registration no. BR04PA-4832 was also recovered from house of the petitioner which was alleged to be used in the offence and the petitioner did not claim himself regarding owner of the seized vehicle. During investigation, the witnesses have also supported the prosecution version.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4094 of 2023(3) dt.08-05-2023 3/3 stands rejected.

The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T