Jayram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1550 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2024 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Jayram Yadav S/o Ramchandra Yadav Resident of Village- Baiju Bigha, P.S.- Gurua, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 183 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 329, 385, 427 and 34 of the IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that one Sushil Singh has submitted his written application to the police on 01.06.2024, for the offence alleged to be committed on 27.05.2025, alleging that when he was constructing Boundary wall at his land, his villager Dharmendra Yadav along with 10 others came by motorcycle having firearm and directed to stop the work and demanded Rs. 50,000/- and committed marpit with his labors and also misbehaved with the female labor due

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1550 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 to which labors have sustained injury and took away Rs. 7,000/- from the informant and also damaged the constructed Boundary wall.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire prosecution story is false, fabricated and concocted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no manner of occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and nothing has been recovered from his possession or his house or any other place occupied by the petitioner which can remotely suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the instant case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the fact that the petitioner is not named accused in the FIR and that his name has later come up on the basis of statement of the co-accused Dharmendra Yadav which carries no evidentiary value and also given the fact that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and the petitioner has only one criminal antecedent that also at the behest of the same informant. Under these circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1550 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sherghati at Gaya in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 183 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Gaurav Sinha/- U