Sushil Yadav @ Ram Sudhir Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.12552 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -73 Year- 1998 Thana -DHANARUA District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Sushil Yadav @ Ram Sudhir Yadav son of Late Saryug Yadav, resident of village- Nanauri, P.S.- Dahanru, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deep Narayan Dubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastrijee(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 08-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Under Criminal Misc. No. 13699 of 2014 prayer for bail made on behalf of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 20.06.2014 only on the ground that period of detention of the petitioner was not at all found justifying the period of abscondance.
However, being in custody since 13.09.2013 as well as taking into account the deficiency persisting before the learned lower court, petitioner Sushil Yadav @ Ram Sudhir Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12552 of 2015 (2) dt.08-05-2015 Judge, Patna in connection with Sessions Trial No. 235 of 2001 arising out of Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 73 of 1998 subject to the condition that the petitioner will have to deposit Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) in the trial court before tendering of bail bond which will be subject to forfeiture in case there happens to be default at the hands of the petitioner during the course of trial, contrary to it, if there happens to be no fault at the hands of the petitioner till conclusion of the trial, then in that event the amount will be returned back to the petitioner on proper identification. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) Amin/- U