Rama Shankar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6672 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2016 Thana- DESARI District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAMA SHANKAR SINGH S/o Baleshwar Singh village-Macharah Raghunandan, P.S-Desri (Sahdehi) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shruti Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-02-2019 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Session Trial No. 366/17 arising out of Deshri P.S. Case No. 94 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of firing on the informant causing injury to him.
Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 06.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34350 of 2017 with direction to the trial court to conclude the trial within a period of six months and liberty was given to the petitioner that if the trial is not concluded, he may renew his prayer for bail in the court below itself.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6672 of 2019(2) dt.07-02-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly conceded the fact that now the evidence has completed and the case is fixed for argument but as the court of learned Sessions Judge, Vaishali (Hajipur) is vacant for last five months, the case could not be taken up for hearing.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail rather this application is disposed of with direction to the Incharge Court to proceed with the argument and try to conclude the trial as early as possible, as there is direction of this Court that the In-charge court is also competent and shall proceed with the trial.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T