Nitesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1419 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Aurangabad ====================================================== NITESH KUMAR Son of Jagarnath Singh @ Jagnnath Singh Resident of Village- Kurmi Phokhra, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar 2.
Sangeeta Kumari Wife of Nitesh Kumar At present resident of VillageTengra, P.SD. Barun, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Aurangabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 42 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the connection with the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to keep his wife with full dignity and honour. It is further submitted that petitioner always ready to settle the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1419 of 2020(3) dt.26-10-2021 2/2 dispute with his wife but the opposite party no. 2 is not ready to settle the dispute.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 42 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. If so advised, the parties will be at liberty to file a petition in the court below for one time settlement or reconciliation of the matter. If such petition is filed, the court below will take initiative in accordance with law. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Jagdish/- U