← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/799/2022disposed

Shyamjee Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-16Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.799 of 2022 ====================================================== Shyamjee Kumar Verma Son of Sri Shivendra Nath Verma, Resident of Ward No. 28, Behind Pankaj Cinema, Eastern Dahiyawan, Butan Bari Garh, P.S. - Dahiyawan, District - Saran, PIN Code - 841301 (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

3.

The Establishment Deputy Collector, Saran at Chapra. 4.

The Block Development Officer, Baniyapur, District - Saran (Bihar). 5.

The District Supply Officer, Saran at Chapra (Bihar). 6.

The Senior Deputy Collector, Disaster Management Section, Collectorate, Saran at Chapra (Bihar).

7.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Chapra, District - Saran (Bihar). 8.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Madhourah, District - Saran (Bihar). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Narayan Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar (SC-11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 16-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief (s) :- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ / order / direction for setting aside the initiation of the Departmental Proceeding against the Petitioner vide Memo No. 767 dated 31.07.2021 (including the Memo of Charges) in Preforma-'K' issued by the District Magistrate whereby he appointed the Additional Collector (Departmental Enquiry), Saran as the

Patna High Court CWJC No.799 of 2022(3) dt.16-03-2026 2/2 Conducting Officer and the Block Development Officer, Baniyapur as the Presenting Officer and directed them to conclude the proceeding within the stipulated period as per the provisions of the C.C.A. (C.C.A) Rules 2005."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the instant application, final order of punishment has been passed in the departmental proceeding.

4. In view of the final order of punishment having been passed, the instant application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law. (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U