← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10565/2017disposed

Saroj Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-16Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10565 of 2017 ====================================================== Saroj Kumari, Wife of Munna Kumar Ram, Resident of Village- Mirzapur, P.O.- Mahna Ganni, Majhaulia, P.S.- Bettiah Mufassil, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

3. The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah.

4. The District Programme Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah.

5. The Child Development Project Officer, Majhaulia, District- West Champaran.

6. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

7. Nidhi Kumari, wife of Manoj Ram, Resident of Village- Mirzapur, P.O.- Mahna Ganni, Majhaulia, P.S.- Bettiah Mufassil, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Kumar Dwivedy For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.P.Ojha-Ga7 For BSEB : Mrs. Namrata Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 16-04-2018 Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case she is granted a liberty to file representation before the respondent no.4 and the respondent no.4 may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a specified time frame.

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall file a composite representation before the respondent no.4 regarding her grievances raised in the writ petition within a period of two

Patna High Court CWJC No.10565 of 2017 (2) dt.16-04-2018 2/2 weeks from today and the respondent no.4 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter. It is further directed that the respondent no.4, while deciding the case of the petitioner shall not be influenced by the order dated 15.5.2017 passed by the District Public Grievance Redressal Officer, East Champaran.

The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U