Patna High CourtCWJC/16540/2008disposed

Rumana Khatoon And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-04-01Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16540 of 2008 ======================================================

1. Rumana Khatoon, w/o Tamkeen Ahmad at present working as Lady Extension Officer, Barachatti Block, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya

2. Savita Sammya, w/o, Naresh Prasad at present working as Lady Extension Officer, Amas Block, P.S. Amas, District- Gaya

3. Anjana Rani, w/o Sri Sunil Kumar Gupta, at present working as Lady Extension Officer, Khijird Area, P.S. khijir Sarai, DistrictGaya

4. I.V. Morgan, w/o Sri Praveer Amos, at present working as Lady Extension Officer, Fatehpur Block, P.S. Fatehpur, District- Gaya

5. Lalima Kumari, w/o Sri Balram Sharma, at present working as Lady Extension Officer, Mohanpur Block, P.S. Mohanpur, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Gaya

5. Deputy Development Commissioner, Gaya .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Satyaveer, Advocate For the State : Mr. Y. P. Sinha, A.A.G. 15, Mr. Shankar Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G. 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 01-04-2016 It appears from the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.1 that necessary payment has been made to the petitioner nos.1 and 2 and for the rest of the petitioners it has been stated in paragraph no.7 of the counter affidavit that arrear of revised pay scale has not been paid to them but the concerned District Magistrates have been directed to pay the said arrears and reminders have been also issued in that regard. However, learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.16540 of 2008 (7) dt.01-04-2016 2 / 2 counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instruction that only the petitioner no.1 has got the payment. So far others are concerned, there is no information.

Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that necessary payment is made to the petitioners as per the statement made in paragraph no.7 of the counter affidavit within a period of two months, if the same has already not been paid. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Sanjay-II/- U