Shailendra Yadav @ Guddu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13638 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2020 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Shailendra Yadav @ Guddu Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav, Resident of Village - Banahi, P.S. - Sahpur, District - Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 08-09-2021 The matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by office when called upon to do so by the office. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Nawanagar P.S. Case No.319 of 2020, instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The recovery of a dead body in a gunny bag has led the police to the petitioner's house. The victim lady was wife of petitioner's brother. In investigation material that has come

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13638 of 2021(4) dt.08-09-2021 2/2 suggests that due to continuous discord between the petitioner's brother and the victim lady, the husband of the victim lady with the help of his brother (petitioner) has committed her murder. Thereafter this petitioner has driven the vehicle with his brother carrying the victim's dead body in a gunny bag and abandoned her dead body near N.H. 30.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been living separately from the victim's husband. In this regard, the sarpanch has issued a certificate. He further submits that the husband of the victim lady is also in custody and the petitioner being brother-in-law of the victim is in custody since 13.09.2020.

Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the rival submissions, this Court, for the present, is not inclined to allow the prayer for bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

The trial court is directed to take all steps to conclude the trial without any undue delay and unnecessary adjournments.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Harish/- U T