Robin Yadav @ Ravindra Yadav @ Rabin Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4692 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -258 Year- 2014 Thana -BALIA District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Robin Yadav @ Ravindra Yadav @ Rabin Yadav, Son of Faudari Yadav @ Rameshwar Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village- Maneri Gachhi, P.O. Lakhminia, Police Station Ballia, District Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Balia P.S. Case No. 258 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, Fulo Devi took away Anita Devi, the daughter of the informant that she has been called by the petitioner at the house of Krishnadeo Pandit and thereafter, Anita Devi did not return and on the mobile of elder daughter of the informant, ransom of Rs. two lakhs was demanded and accordingly, it is suspected that Fulo Devi, the petitioner and Krishnadeo Pandit are the kidnapper.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4692 of 2016 (3) dt.29-03-2016 2/3 Submission is of false implication and that Fulo Devi is facing trial vide Sessions Trial No. 498 of 2015 wherein the informant and other witnesses have turned hostile and have not supported the prosecution version, the informant, Lal Pari Devi, during cross-examination has stated that her daughter used to attend the meeting and she has gone to attend the meeting and did not return, against the petitioner, there is no legal and cogent material but he has got criminal antecedent resulting he is suffering in custody since 08.12.2015. The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that during trial, the witnesses including the informant have not supported the prosecution version.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Balia P.S. Case No. 258 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4692 of 2016 (3) dt.29-03-2016 3/3 dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) ajaypd./- U T