Munna Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11224 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2014 Thana -HATHIDAH DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Munna Paswan Son of Boran Paswan resident of village - Dariyapur, P.S. Hathidah, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat(Spl. P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 06-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 302/34 of IPC 3(ii)(v) of S.C. & S.T. (P.A.) Act.

It is submitted that according to allegation, the petitioner was standing in the lane at the time of alleged occurrence and when the co-accused after committing the murder of the deceased came out of the house, the petitioner along with others fled away from there.

It is further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances, co-accused Chunchun Singh @ Chunnu Singh @ Mukesh Singh @ Mukesh Kumar has been granted bail vide

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11224 of 2015 (2) dt.06-05-2015 2/2 Annexure-2. It is also submitted that the petitioner has a criminal antecedent in which he is on bail.

Learned counsel for the State has submitted that Chunchun Singh has no criminal antecedent, whereas, the petitioner has a criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A. C. J. M., Barh District- Patna/court concerned in Hathidah P. S. Case No. 71 of 2014 after framing of charge with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T