Bimla Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3009 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.
Bimla Devi W/O Late Bharat Sah Resident Of Muhalla- Supaul Nagar Parisad Ward No.-12, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul 2.
Rani Devi @ Rani Kumari D/O Late Bharat Sah Resident Of MuhallaSupaul Nagar Parisad Ward No.-12, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul 3.
Arbind Sah S/O- Nagendra Sah Resident Of Village- Singheshwar Sthan, P.S.- Singheshwar, District- Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
Manisha Kumari W/O - Raja Sah, D/O Shalendra Sah Resident Of MuhallaRajpur Hat Ward No.-3, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects, if any, within three weeks. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 504, 506, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3009 of 2022(3) dt.08-02-2023 2/2 the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that the petitioners are the in-laws of the victim. He submits that the husband of the informant has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Supaul Mahila P.S. Case No. 13 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T