Dipendra Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6177 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -556 Year- 2015 Thana -BETTIAH TOWN DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Dipendra Kumar Verma Son of Arun Kumar Prasad, resident of VillageDhankutwa, Police Station- Balthar, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.M. Rahman (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 556 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, the petitioner working as part time accountant in the agency of the informant, took away 550 bags of cement valued at Rs. 1,66,075 and misappropriated the same and further had taken advance of Rs. 1,16,149/- and when the same was demanded, he stopped to come and further switched off his
mobile.
Submission is of false implication and that there is nothing on the record to show that the petitioner was entrusted any thing, from loading slip which is annexed with the F.I.R. it reveals that the same is not signed by the petitioner, rather the same is signed by Daya Shankar and another by Sudhakar Kumar, the matter relates to accounting and not of any criminal act and the petitioner suffering in custody since 19.12.2015, deserves sympathetic consideration.
The learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner after taking advantage of absence of the informant took away 550 bags of cement and further he is not ready to return the advance amount also.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the detention of the petitioner, now he is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bettiah, Distt. West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 556 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within
the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T