← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6228/2016bail granted

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-26Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6228 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -339 Year- 2015 Thana -SHIVSAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Singh Son of Sri Jamuna Singh, Resident of Village & P.O. - Sikrau, P.S. - Sheosagar, District - Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Usha Kumari-1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramesh Chandra(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 339 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 27(b)(ii), 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

An allegation has been made for violation of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6228 of 2016 (2) dt.26-02-2016 satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 339 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T