Baikunth Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2951 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Baikunth Pandey Son of Late Bhagelu Pandey R/o Village - Samhuti, P.S. - Dinara District - Rohtas.
2.
Chandrawati Devi @ Chandawat Devi Wife of Kameshwar Pandey R/o Village - Samhuti, P.S. - Dinara District - Rohtas. 3.
Ram Daso Devi @ Ram Dasiya Devi Wife of Late Ram Chandra Pandey R/o Village - Samhuti, P.S. - Dinara District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Dinara P.S. Case no.261 of 2025 registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S, 2023.
3. Allegation in the F.I.R is that all accused persons including the petitioners herein came to the house of the informant variously armed and indulged in assault causing injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2951 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. There is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners of assault upon the informant and his wife. It is further submitted that the injuries suffered by the informant and his wife are simple which is in the form of laceration, a copy of the injury report has been annexed as Annexure-P/2 to the application. There is case and counter case between the parties and Annexure-3 is the case filed by the petitioners' side indicating that injuries have been sustained by petitioners' side also. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertake to cooperate in the case/trial.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the fact and considering that there is general and omnibus allegation leveled against the petitioners arising out of an incident which happen at the spur of the moment coupled with the fact that injuries are simple in nature, it is directed that the petitioners above named, having no criminal antecedent in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Dinara P.S. Case no.261
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2951 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T