Ajay Kumar Poddar v. The State Of Bihar The Director Of Prosecution, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.177 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14348 Year-2014 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Poddar S/o Late Nageshwar Poddar resident of Village - Kiul Gadhara, P.S. - Barauni, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar the Director Of Prosecution, Patna 2.

Rajendra Singh Gaur son of not known Senior Section Engineer Work, East Central Railway, Gadhara, District - Begusarai. 3.

Shushil Kumar Son of not known Incharge Inspector, RPF, East Central Railway, Gadhara, District - Begusarai.

4.

Ram Balak Paswan Son of not known Circle Inspector, Barauni Anchal, District - Begusarai.

5.

Rakesh Kumar Poddar son of Sri Sushi Poddar resident of Village - Kiul, P.S. - Barauni, District - Begusarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate Mr.Sadanand Deo Prasad, Advocate For the Res. No. 2 & 5 :

Mr.Dinesh Maharaj, Advocate For the Res. No. 4 :

Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and respondent nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Although, the petitioner has challenged the revisional order dated 26.09.2016 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Begusarai in Criminal Revision No. 356 of 2016 whereby learned Sessions Judge has refused to interfere with the order of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai passed in Complaint Case No. 14348(C)/14 dismissing the complaint case

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.177 of 2017(6) dt.25-02-2020 2/2 filed by the petitioner, after some argument learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ application with liberty to seek his remedy, if any, available to him for the alleged damages caused to him by illegal acts and omissions of the respondents.

The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn. It is always open for the petitioner to seek his remedy as may be advised to him in accordance with law.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/ved U T