Chunnu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3301 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-649 Year-2021 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Chunnu Sharma Son Of Rabindra Sharma R/O Mohalla- Dewariya Near Panitanki, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocte For the State :

Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 30-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 328, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is a case of commission of murder of the son of the informant. It is alleged against the petitioner that he took out the deceased from his house and thereafter dead body was found with injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3301 of 2022(3) dt.30-08-2022 2/2 contra contra this case. There is no eye witness to the occurrence and only on the basis of suspicion, the petitioner has been roped in the present case. In contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned A.P.P for the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner that he took away the deceased from his house and thereafter the dead body was recovered. The postmortem report also suggests the cause of death due to multiple injuries.

In the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner stands rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T