← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1100/2025disposed

Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-23Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1100 of 2025 ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar Son of Indradev Singh, Resident of village and P.O.- Bilari, P.S.- Katri Sarai, Dist.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department of Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Secretary, General Administration Department Government of Bihar. 4.

The District Magistrate Nalanda, Bihar Sharif. 5.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, District- Nalanda, Bihar Sharif. 6.

The Additional Chief Secretary, local Area Engineering Organization, Department of Planning and Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7.

The Circle Officer, Katri sarai, Nalanda.

8.

The Chief Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Planning Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 9.

The Block Panchayati Raj Officer-cum- Executive Officer, Katri Sarai, District- Nalanda.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Harun Quraeshi, AC to SC-01 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and exhaustive representation along with all the relevant documents before the District Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif (respondent no. 4). If the petitioner files a detailed

Patna High Court CWJC No.1100 of 2025(2) dt.23-01-2025 2/2 and exhaustive representation along with all the relevant documents within a period of four weeks before the respondent no. 4, the respondent no. 4 is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a period of six weeks after hearing all the concerned in accordance with law.

3. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U