Manish Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4636 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -192 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA CITY CHOWK District- PATNA ====================================================== Manish Mahto S/o Subhash Mahto, Resident of Mandaipar, Bahari Begampur, P.s. Bypass, Distt- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. D.P.Tiwary(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

17-02-2016 Heard Sri Nityanand Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Damodar Prasad Tiwary, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

This is the 3rd attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the sole petitioner. Earlier, by order dated 03-02-2016, a report was called for from the trial court regarding the stage of the case. The trial court was also directed to indicate regarding the number of charge-sheeted witnesses and witnesses examined till date. In view of the earlier order, report dated 8th February, 2016 has been received and kept at flag 'A'. The report suggests that out of seven charge-sheeted witnesses, six have already been examined. Now the investigating officer and one doctor are required to be examined.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4636 of 2016 (3) dt.17-02-2016 2/2 In view of the fact that the trial is proceeding expeditiously, there is no reason to alter the earlier order. Accordingly, the prayer for bail again stands rejected with an indication that learned trial court may conclude the trial expeditiously without any delay. The learned trial court is directed to proceed with the case at least twice in a week so that the case may come to its logical end without unnecessary delay. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T