Satish Singh @ Satish Kumar And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5923 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -103 Year- 2015 Thana -KARAI PARSURAI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. SATISH SINGH @ SATISH KUMAR

2. Ravish Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Both sons of Bakhori Singh, both resident of village- Mahaddinagar, P.s.- Karaiparsurai, District- Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 05-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Karaiparsurai P.S. Case No. 103 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, Mukesh Singh after entering into the house of the informant assaulted the husband of the informant and informant also and then the husband of the informant pierced Barchchi to Mukesh Singh and thereafter, fled away from the house but the petitioners and other FIR named accused person,

after searching the husband of the informant, killed the husband of the informant by piercing Barchchi and threw the dead body in the ditch.

Submission is of false implication and that there is no eye witness of the occurrence, the deceased has himself killed Mukesh Singh and only on suspicion, the informant has named the petitioners and others, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and, as such, the petitioners who are suffering in custody since 07.09.2015, deserve sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes by submitting that the petitioners are named in the First Information Report. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the general and omnibus allegation, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri.

Sanjay Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Karaiparsurai P.S. Case No.

present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T