Md. Mustafa Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3364 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-990 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Banka ====================================================== Md. Mustafa Ansari Son Of Jahir Ansari R/O Village- Chilmil, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Noosrat Khatoon D/O- Md. Jabbar Ansari, Wife Of Md. Mustafa Ansari At Present Resides In The Village- Desra, P.S. And District- Banka ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Nurul Hoda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of dowry demand of Rs. One lack from the complainant and due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand, all the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the complainant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as a matter of fact prior to the present complaint case Barahat P.S. Case No. 424 of 2019 was lodged on the written of Mother Jaibun Khatoon for the offence under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3364 of 2022(2) dt.15-06-2022 2/2 Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 307 and 379 of the IPC against the father of the complainant Jabbar Ansari, her mother, brothers and other family members and after submissions of chargesheet dated 30.11.2019, cognizance has also been taken for the offence under the aforesaid Sections of the IPC. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant with full honour and dignity.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Miss Ruby Kumari, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Banka in connection with Complaint Case No. 990 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T