Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2809/2025dismissed

Nilesh Ram @ Nilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-14Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2809 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2024 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Nilesh Ram @ Nilesh Kumar S/O Late Rajendra Ram @ Late Jogendra Ram R/O Village- Fatehpur, P.S- Didarganj, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 12 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 302, 304(B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. All the F.I.R. named accused persons including the petitioner, on non-fulfillment of demand of dowry, in furtherance of the common intention are said to have committed murder of the informant's daugther after assaulting.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against him

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2809 of 2025(2) dt.14-02-2025 2/2 is totally false and based on concocted facts. He had neither made any dowry demand nor tormented the deceased over the demand of dowry. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has been languishing in custody since 01.08.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

8. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T