Saroj Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3392 of 2008 ====================================================== Saroj Devi, w/o Late Surendra Prasad, r/o village Bahwalpur, P.O. + P.s. Giriyak, District - Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. the Superintendent of Education, Nalanda

3. the Headmaster, primary School Barchi Bigha, Giriyak, District Nalanda

4. the Accountant General , (A & E) - II, Bihar, Patna

5. the Senior Accounts Officer, Office of Accountant General (A & E) - II, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivekanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to SC No. 29 as well as Sri Vivekanand Kumar, learned counsel for Accountant General.

This case by order dated 20.2.2015 was adjourned for filing appropriate affidavit on behalf of Accountant General since orally it was informed that after issuance of sanction order from the State, P.P.O. has already been issued by the Accountant General. Thereafter, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 4 and 5/ Accountant General, through which the said P.P.O. has been brought on record and in paragraph no. 5 it

Patna High Court CWJC No.3392 of 2008 (10) dt.18-03-2015 2/2 has been indicated that after receiving the required papers from the Department, Accountant General Office has issued revised pension payment order vide its office letter dated 9.2.2015. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite his best effort, he is not in a position to get further instruction. In view of the facts and circumstances and the fact that revised P.P.O. has already been issued, the court expects that the respondent / State will take steps on the basis of revised P.P.O. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty that if still any grievance exists, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U