← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3099/2018dismissed

Krishnandan Prasad v. Sri Sanjay Kumar, The State Of Bihar Its Principal Secretary, R. W. D., Bihar, Patna And ORS

2020-01-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3099 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15280 of 2017 ====================================================== Krishnandan Prasad Son of late Chottan Kewat R/o Village-Newada, nearby Gyan Bharti School, Govardhan Mandir, Navin Nagar, Newada, P.O.P.S.Dist.- Newada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Sri Sanjay Kumar, The State Of Bihar Its Principal Secretary, R. W. D., Bihar, Patna and Ors 2.

Sri. P. Sashank Kumar, The Accountant General Bihar.Patna. 3.

Sri Rahul, The Finance Commissioner, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 4.

Smt. Saroja Sharma, the Collector, Saharsa.

5.

Sri Yogesh Chand Pandey, The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

6.

Sri Yogesh Chand Pandey, The Principal Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

7.

Sri Rama Awtar Sah, The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle, Saharsa.

8.

Sri Subhash Chandra, The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Rural Works Division, Saharsa.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mallika Mazumdar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay - Ga 5 For A/G :

Dr. Anand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-01-2020 The learned counsel for the contemnors submits that the first A.C.P. and second A.C.P. benefits as also the benefits of third A.C.P. have already been granted to the petitioner herein and infact, the same has also been paid in monetary terms, by way of payment of a sum of Rs. 7,85,835/- to the petitioner herein.

Patna High Court MJC No.3099 of 2018(5) dt.29-01-2020 2/2 The aforesaid averment made in the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties, has not been controverted, hence this Court is satisfied that the order of this Court, disobedience whereof has been complained of, stands complied with.

Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U