Patna High CourtC. REV./46/2017disposed

M/S New Chaudhary Bakery Through Its Proprietor Ramnandan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-01The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.46 of 2017 In LPA 1074 of 2015 ====================================================== M/s New Chaudhary Bakery Through Its Proprietor Ramnandan Chaudhary, S/o Ambika Choudhary, Resident of Village- Ualow, P.S. & District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar.

3. The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna through its Managing Director.

4. Darbhanga Industrial Area Development Authority through its Managing Director.

5. The Executive Director, Bihar Industrail Area Development Authority, Regional Office, Darbhanga.

6. The Managing Director, Darbhanga Industrial Area Development Authority, Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha (Aag 7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 01-08-2017 Apart from the fact that there is delay of more than one year and three months in filing of this application, review is sought only on the ground that the unit was again in commercial production and functional in June, 2009 and, therefore, an enquiry at the cost of the petitioner be ordered in the matter. In view of the above, no case for review is made out

Patna High Court C. REV. No.46 of 2017 (3) dt.01-08-2017 2/2 in view of law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Sasi (Dead) Through Legal Representatives vs. Arvindakshan Nair & Ors., (2017) 4 SCC 692.

In case there is any development or change in factual position with regard to the company being functional, the petitioner can take recourse to the appropriate remedy afresh, in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U