Md. Sonu @ Md. Sonu Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8818 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -680 Year- 2014 Thana -NAWADA TOWN District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Md. Sonu @ Md. Sonu Alam Son of Md. Kalam Resident of MohallaChainpur, Police Station- Biharsharif, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 680 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. At the very outset it has been submitted that in this case similarly situated other co-accused namely Pintu Paswan and Md. Sarfraj have already been allowed bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.03.2015 and 08.04.2014 in Cri. Misc. No. 10561 of 2015 and Cri. Misc. No. 14521 of 2015 respectively and the petitioner by remaining in custody more now has been sufficiently penalized and as such he deserves

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8818 of 2015 (2) dt.10-04-2015 2/2 sympathetic consideration.

Learned A.P.P. is not in a position to distinguish the case of the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada arising out of Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 680 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T