← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2184/2016withdrawn

Ajit Kumar Dubey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-08-30Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2184 of 2016 ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Dubey son of Late Prabodh Kumar Dubey, resident of villageSripalpur, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur, at present residing at Jora Mandir, Near Ara Town Police Station, M.P. Bagh, Ara, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara 3.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Ara, District- Bhojpur 4.

The Sub-Returning Officer, Sadar, Ara, District- Bhojpur 5.

The Circle officer, Sadar, Ara, District- Bhojpur 6.

Devendra Kumar @ Devendra Prasad @ Devendra Yadav, son of Late Jhaman Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Rajendra Nagar, Near Maharaja College Gate, Ara, P.S.- Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bibhakar Tiwary, Advocate For the State :

Smt. Binita Singh, SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 30-08-2025 Heard Mr. Bibhakar Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"(i) to issue an appropriate writ, preferably in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the order bearing letter no.55, dated 06.01.2016 issued by the Sub-divisional Officer, Sadar, Ara by which the Circle Officer, Sadar, Ara has been directed to demarcate the land of

Patna High Court CWJC No.2184 of 2016(2) dt.30-08-2025 2/2 respondent no. 6;

(ii) to hold and declare that the lands of respondent no.6 adjoining the land of the petitioner has been demarcated in Demarcation case no. 35/2015-16 and Demarcation case no.

42/2015-16;

(iii) to grant any other relief(s), for which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U