Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4910/2016rejected

Sonika Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2016-03-29Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4910 of 2016 (3) dt.29-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4910 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -160 Year- 2015 Thana -SABAUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Sonika Devi D/o Amarnath Yadav, Wife of Late Brajesh Yadav, resident of village- Mansarpur, P.S.- Sabour, District- Bhagalpur.... .. Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad (App) For the informant : Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the Sate.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 160 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner, father-in-law and brother-in-law of the son of the informant caught the son of the informant and brought in the house and after tying him in a pillar assaulted brutally causing his death. The petitioner is the wife of the deceased.

Submission is of false implication and that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, allegations are general and omnibus in nature, co-accused Nirmala Devi and Ram Bilash Yadav have been allowed bail by another co-ordinate Bench of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4910 of 2016 (3) dt.29-03-2016 this Court and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP duly assisted by learned counsel for the informant opposes by submitting that in presence of the informant her son and husband of the petitioner was killed by the petitioner and others and it is a brutal murder. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the allegation attributed against the petitioner to be serious in nature, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, accordingly, her such prayer stands rejected. However, considering the period of detention, let the trial be expedited and concluded within nine months. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T