Gurudeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9455 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -291 Year- 2013 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Gurudeo Yadav, S/o Late Dev Yadav, R/o Village- Shiva Bigha, P.S. + District- Jehanabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kunwar Digvijay Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. A.Haque (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under section 385/34 of the I.P.C Allegedly, the informant and other police personnel recovered pamphlet pasted at the shop of Bikan Mochi containing threats to the police personnel and having anti government literature and during enquiry it reveals that the petitioner and other co-accused had gone there and affixed the pamphlet. Submission is of false implication and that no one has seen the petitioner affixing the pamphlet, the police personnel are the witnesses, there is no legal and tangible material against the petitioner and he has been in custody since 06.10.2015, the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9455 of 2016 (4) dt.22-06-2016 2/2 petitioner has also been made accused in one more case in which he is on bail.
The learned A.P.P. submits that co-accused Ravindra Yadav @ Ravindra Prasad @ Doctor has been allowed bail. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Gopal Prasad, A.D.J.-II, Jehanabad in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 291 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T