Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6044/2016bail granted

Md. Munna v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-22Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6044 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -521 Year- 2015 Thana -GAYA KOTWALI District- GAYA ====================================================== Md. Munna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansural Haque(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 521 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 382 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner was caught with stolen battery, knife and one mobile when he was trying to flee away after stealing the battery from truck of the informant causing injury to the informant.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is a poor rickshaw puller, there was some scuffle between the petitioner and informant for the fare of rickshaw resulting the petitioner has been implicated falsely, both side have received injury, the injury received by the informant is also simple

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6044 of 2016 (2) dt.22-02-2016 2/2 and as such the petitioner who is suffering in custody since 11.12.2015 deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned A.P.P. opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner shall be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned C.J.M., Gaya, in connection with Kotwali, P.S. Case No. 521 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T