Bikash Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3848 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2021 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.
Bikash Singh Son of Late Sadanand Singh Resident of Village- Konag, P. S. - Halsi, District- Lakhisarai.
2.
Jeevan Kumar @ Jeevan Kumar Singh son of Bikash Singh Resident of Village- Konag, P. S. - Halsi, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 109 of 2021, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324,307,379,504,34 of the I.P.C.
3. As per the prosecution case, on the date of occurrence, when the informant was in his house he noticed that some of the accused persons were putting pillar in his land. When he protested, all the accused persons including the petitioners started assaulting him and his family members who had come to save him. The accused persons also snatched a golden chain worth Rs. 50,000/- from the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3848 of 2026(3) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 case due to previous land dispute. Injury on the injured are simple in nature. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed under bailable Sections but cognizance has been taken under Sections 307, 379, 324 of the I.P.C. There is no chance of tampering of the evidence and absconding the petitioners. Petitioner no. 1 has two criminal antecedents but the same is not of the same nature. Petitioner No. 2 has clean antecedent. Petitioners undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and the injuries are simple in nature, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Lakhisarai in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 109 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T