Devendra Singh @ Devendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45242 of 2014 (2) dt.03-03-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45242 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2010 Thana -CHAKIA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Raza Singh @ Raj Kumar Shahi S/o Mahesh Singh Resident of villageShitalpur, P.S.- Chakia, District- East Champaran, Motiahri .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.8641 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2010 Thana -CHAKIA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Devendra Singh @ Devendra Kumar Singh Son of Ram Mohan Singh resident of village Semra, P.S. Chakia, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.45242 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Om Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.8641 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Kishore Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Rab (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioners seek bail in Chakiya P.S. Case No. 41/10, under Section 386 Indian Penal Code and 3/4 Explosive Substance Act.

The informant alleged that some criminals came to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45242 of 2014 (2) dt.03-03-2015 his mobile shop and exploded bombs. Earlier, ransom was demanded. The First Information Report is instituted against unknown.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that from perusal of the record it appears that name of Raza Singh @ Raj Kumar Shahni figured in the supervising note of SDPO, and the name of Devendra Kumar Singh appeared in the case in confessional statement of one Bablu, in para 62 of the case diary. Thereafter, supervising authority named the petitioner Devendra Kumar Singh in supervision note, but it appears that the investigating officer did not get any tangible evidence to show the involvement of the petitioner. Co-accused has already been enlarged on bail.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners above named are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Chakiya P.S. Case No. 41/10.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) Vinita/- U T