Vikash Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3617 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2020 Thana- RISIYAP District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Vikash Singh Son of Raghubir Singh Resident of Village - Jagdishpur, P.S. Jamhore, District - Aurangabad, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual court proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 364/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier, prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 03.11.2021 in Cr. Misc. No. 16780 of 2021 with liberty to him to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now charges have been framed against the petitioner on 03.12.2021

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3617 of 2022(2) dt.16-02-2022 2/3 under Sections 364, 302, 201, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 01.10.2020. Considering the facts that the charges have been framed against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with S.T. No. 89 of 2021 arising out of Risiyap P.S. Case No. 72 of 2020, subject to the conditions:

(1) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to who he is related with the petitioner. He will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(II) that the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date fixed in the case and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled. (III) that the petitioner will mark his attendance in the local police station in the first week of every month till conclusion of trial, failing which the prosecution will be at

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3617 of 2022(2) dt.16-02-2022 3/3 liberty to move cancellation of his bail bond. (IV) that the bailor shall also stated on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T