Ankit Kumar @ Ankit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4282 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2020 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Ankit Kumar @ Ankit Yadav Son Of Ramu Yadav Resident Of Village - Sagarpur, P.S.- Sakari, Distt.- Madhubani.
2.
Rithik Kumar @ Rithik Yadav Son Of Tejnarayan Yadav Resident Of Village - Sagarpur, P.S.- Sakari, Distt.- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumari Shubham For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 447 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant by means of pipe as a result of which he became unconscious and fell on the ground.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4282 of 2022(2) dt.14-07-2022 2/2 case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the informant is simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the fact that the injury found upon the informant is simple in nature, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 107 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T