Madan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5929 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -125 Year- 2015 Thana -MINAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Madan Prasad Son of Bishwanath Prasad, Resident of Village - Minapur Center, P.S. - Minapur, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, he is not been put on T.I.P., and only on the basis of confessional statement he is suffering in custody since 11.8.2015. Learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent.
In the facts and circumstances stated above,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5929 of 2016 (2) dt.19-02-2016 2/2 considering that similarly situated co-accused Subodh Kumar, and further other co-accused Santosh Kumar, Rajeev Sah and Bharat Mahto have already been allowed bail by another co-ordinate Benches of this Court and as such the petitioner is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T