← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2850/2022bail granted

Baleshwar Prasad Singh @ Baleshwar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-11Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2850 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2021 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar ====================================================== BALESHWAR PRASAD SINGH @ BALESHWAR PRASAD Son of Deosharan Prasad Singh @ Deosharan Prasad Resident of Village- Ganipur, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda, Presently Posted at Police Line, Katihar, P.S.- Katihar, Sahayak, District- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that petitioner was suspended as S.I. Barari P.S. and went to give his joining at police center, further alleges that petitioner did not hand over charge of 24 cases pending for investigation with him, nor had submitted charge-sheet in 91 cases, thus had misappropriated the document relating to the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2850 of 2022(2) dt.11-08-2022 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from bare perusal of allegation as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that no criminal offence, prima facie, is made out though it might be a case of administrative laps for which the petitioner would have been proceeded departmental. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barari P.S. Case No. 12 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T