Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2035 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2025 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Bittu Kumar Son of Chunni Yadav R/o Village - Basmatiya, P.S. - Kiul, Dist. - Lakhisarai.

2.

Pravesh Kumar Son of Shiv Kumar Yadav R/o Village - Basmatiya, P.S. - Kiul, Dist. - Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 132, 109(1) and 303(2) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, along with 25 to 30 unknown persons, thrashed A.S.I. Manikant Yadav, who was sitting on the seized tractor and thereafter, sped away from the place of occurrence with the seized tractor and trailer.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2035 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/2 behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. There are general and omnibus allegations and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they, along with other named accused persons and 25 to 30 unknown persons, thrashed A.S.I. Manikant Yadav while he was discharging his official duties and fled away with the seized tractor and trailer and thus, created hindrance in discharge of official duties and assaulted a police personnel. Petitioner No. 1 has got two criminal antecedents and Petitioner No. 2 has got one criminal antecedent.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, gravity of offence and criminal antecedent of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T