Kataila @ Munna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6034 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -166 Year- 2015 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Kataila @ Munna Singh S/o Late Balkishore Singh Resident of Village - Jaimara, P.S. - Barauni (Refinery), District - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Haque(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barauni, P.S. Case No. 166 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 386, 387, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, the petitioner came at the wine shop, demanded wine, sell amount and further Rs. 1,00,000/-per month as a ransom and on refusal by the informant opened fire but the informant and his associates saved themselves. Submission is of false implication and that no injury has been caused to anyone, the petitioner has been implicated only with a view to put him behind the bar, there is no delivery of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6034 of 2016 (2) dt.22-02-2016 2/2 money, the petitioner has not snatched even a single paisa from the shop and as such the petitioner who is suffering in custody since 9.5.2015 deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the detention the petitioner now he is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned C.J.M., Begusarai, in connection with Barauni, P.S. Case No. 166 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T