Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7476/2025bail rejected

Mansur Alam @ Mansur v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-07Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7476 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2023 Thana- GALGALIYA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Mansur Alam @ Mansur S/O Dhan Mohammad Resident of Village- Bhaskar Bhitta, Ward No. 4, P.S- Galgalia, Distt.- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-03-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 376, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, on the point of pistol, this petitioner committed rape on the victim.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since 16.08.2024.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7476 of 2025(2) dt.07-03-2025 2/2 accusation that on the point of pistol, he committed rape on the victim. The victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has supported the prosecution case. Petitioner has also got three criminal antecedents.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, statement of victim recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is rejected.

7. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 16.08.2024, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same, as early as possible. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T