← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6422/2026bail granted

Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-22Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6422 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2020 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh Son of Late Brijraj Singh R/O Village Chitaur, P.S.- Aandar, District - Siwan.

2.

Rohit Singh @ Rohit Kumar @ Chandan Singh Son of Ajay Singh R/O Village Chitaur, P.S.- Aandar, District - Siwan. 3.

Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh @ A. K. Singh Son of Late Brijraj Singh R/O Village Chitaur, P.S.- Aandar, District - Siwan. 4.

Priyesh Singh @ Priyesh Kumar Singh Son of Bipin Singh R/O Village Chitaur, P.S.- Aandar, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Priyanka Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Aandar P.S. Case No. 62 of 2020 lodged on 14.05.2020, for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against five named accused persons including the present petitioners. It has been alleged by the informant that in the morning of

2/4 05.05.2020, when the informant's father was returning to his house, then all the accused persons who are adjacent neighbours started abusing him and also assaulted him, due to which he sustained injury. When the informant came to rescue his father, then he was also assaulted by the accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Counsel submits that from the content of the FIR, it become clear that the offence has alleged to be made in the morning of 05.05.2020, but the FIR has been lodged on 14.05.2020 i.e. after a delay of about 11 days. The said delay has not been explained. He further submits that for the same date and place of occurrence, there are case and counter case from both the sides i.e. one case has been lodged from the petitioners' side bearing Aandar P.S. Case No. 63 of 2020 (Annexure-2) and the present case has been lodged from the informant's side bearing Aandar P.S. Case No. 62 of 2020 (Annexure-1). He submits that both the parties are resident of the same village and case diary has also been called in this case vide order dated 04.02.2026. Counsel submits that from the case diary, it is clear that the injuries are simple in nature and due to dirty village politics, the present case has been lodged and both parties received injuries.

3/4 He further submits that the petitioners have clean antecedent and they are ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon them.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners but submits that both parties are resident of the same village and adjacent neighbours and there are case and counter case from both the sides in which, both sides have sustained injuries.

6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) each as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Siwan, in connection with Aandar P.S. Case No. 62 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 with further conditions:- (i) the petitioners shall appear before the Trial Court on each and every scheduled date, and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without any plausible reason/explanation shall be resulted into cancellation of their bail bonds by the Trial Court itself;

4/4 (ii) repetition of such type of case in the future shall also be resulted into cancellation of their bail bonds by the Trial Court.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T