Satyendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8834 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2015 Thana -BELCHHI District- PATNA ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar Son of Sri Arvind Prasad resident of village Bagha Tilha, P.s. Belchhi District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arvind Kr.Panday(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 420, 467 and 468 of the I.P.C Allegedly, the petitioner was caught in drunken condition and from his possession identity Card, Driving License, Sakti Card, PAN Card, ATM, SIM, Mobile set and Educational certificate of Pintu Kumar were recovered and he confessed that he used to obtain railway pass on the forged document after obtaining call letters to give examination.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner was in drunken condition and there was some altercation and the police implicated him. The petitioner has got no criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8834 of 2015 (2) dt.10-04-2015 2/2 antecedent and he is suffering in custody since 20.01.2015. Charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering detention of the petitioner and further considering that charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and as such the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Barh in Belchhi P.S. Case No. 01 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T