Chano Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2988 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2019 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

CHANO YADAV Son of Shiv Yadav Resident of Village- Darima, P.S.- Dhaira, District- Jamui.

2.

Santosh Yadav @ Khelo Yadav Son of Late Churaman Yadav Resident of Village- Darima, P.S.- Dhaira, District- Jamui. 3.

Shankar Yadav Son of Titu Yadav Resident of Village- Darima, P.S.- Dhaira, District- Jamui.

4.

Manoj Yadav Son of Titu Yadav Resident of Village- Darima, P.S.- Dhaira, District- Jamui.

5.

Basant Yadav Son of Brahmdeo Yadav Resident of Village- Darima, P.S.- Dhaira, District- Jamui.

6.

Mantu Yadav @ Mantu @ Gohla Son of Mahadeo Yadav Resident of Village- Darima, P.S.- Dhaira, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Dr.Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. Learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw this application as against petitioner nos.3 and 4, as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2988 of 2022(3) dt.29-08-2022 2/2 they have been apprehended by the police during pendency of this application.

Permission is granted.

Accordingly, the instant application as against petitioner no.3 and 4 is dismissed as withdrawn.

Now, this application is being heard with regard to petitioner nos. 1, 2, 5 and 6 only.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw this application. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn.

However, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass the order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T