Chikana Ram @ Chikuri Ram @ Prabhat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3676 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2022 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Chikana Ram @ Chikuri Ram @ Prabhat S/o Jagarnath Ram R/o vill - Bharsara, P.O.- Kakila, P.S. - Jagdishpur, Distt.- Bhojpur 2.

Ritesh Kumar S/o Dina Ram @ Dinanath Ram R/o vill - Bharsara, P.O.- Kakila, P.S. - Jagdishpur, Distt.- Bhojpur 3.

Amresh Kumar @ Golu Ram S/o Dina Ram @ Dinanath Ram R/o vill - Bharsara, P.O.- Kakila, P.S. - Jagdishpur, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akash Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 354, 379, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant and others, who came to pacify the matter.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3676 of 2025(2) dt.07-02-2025 2/3 Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is totally false and based on concocted facts. Nothing specific has been attributed against them. There is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. The injuries sustained by the informant's side were found simple in nature. Similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 24.02.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 64706 of 2022. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no specific overt act against the petitioners and similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No.221 of 2022, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3676 of 2025(2) dt.07-02-2025 3/3 the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T