Uma Shankar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14067 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -31 Year- 2010 Thana -BELSAND District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Uma Shankar Sahani son of Janu Lal Sahani resident of village - Paharpur, Police Station - Tariyani, District - Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. M.K. Gautam (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 27-04-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 25.09.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 447, 448, 323, 427, 435, 332, 333, 337, 353, 186, 307, 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and 17 of Criminal Law Amendment Act. It is alleged that Maoist gave a call for closure against Green Hunt Operation of the police when 500-600 male and female attached on the Bharat Gas Agency and when the police tried to pacify the situation then the police jeep was set on fire, though the police also resorted to fire. It is submitted by learned counsel for the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14067 of 2015 (02) dt.27-04-2015 2/2 petitioner that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and his name subsequently sprang up during investigation when the accusation is against the mob.
Considering the omnibus and general accusation against the mob and the investigation has already concluded, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Belsand P.S. Case No. 31 of 2010.
Since the petitioner is accused in two other cases under 395 IPC, the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he substantially gets involved in some serious nature of the offence or defaults for two consecutive occasions.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T