Guru Charan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13360 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2020 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Guru Charan Ram Son of Sri Keso Ram Resident of Village- Tekari Kala, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur.

2.

Jai Prakash Ram Son of Sri Keso Ram Resident of Village- Tekari Kala, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur.

3.

Keso Ram Son of Pheku Ram Resident of Village- Tekari Kala, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur.

4.

Rabindra Ram Son of Kisore Ram Resident of Village- Tekari Kala, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur.

5.

Dukhanti Ram Son of Kisore Ram Resident of Village- Tekari Kala, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur.

6.

Surendra Ram Son of Kisore Ram Resident of Village- Tekari Kala, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur.

7.

Om Prakash Ram Son of Late Munni Ram Resident of Village- Tekari Kala, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur.

8.

Suraj Ram Son of Late Munni Ram Resident of Village- Tekari Kala, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through the virtual court proceeding.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13360 of 2021(2) dt.11-01-2022 2/2 Allegation against the petitioners is that they beaten the informant with common intention, as a result of which informant sustained injury.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that occurrence took place on 18.07.2020 but injury report was produced by the informant before the police on 16.07.2020 which falsifies the prosecution story. He further submits that petitioners have one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that petitioners have wrongly enclosed the injury report which is part of the case diary, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 621 of 2020.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T