← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13348/2021allowed

Vijay Bhushan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-11Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13348 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2019 Thana- DAWATH District- Rohtas ====================================================== Vijay Bhushan Chaudhary Son of Ram Rahasya Chaudhary Resident of Village- Gangati, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through the virtual court proceeding.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 353, 385, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the junior engineer when he was on duty. Petitioner are working as a human force under his supervision and also snatched a cash of Rs. 3000/- from his packet.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13348 of 2021(2) dt.11-01-2022 2/2 petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioner never assaulted the informant and he has manufactured the injury report. The injury found on the informant is simple in nature. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dawath P.S. Case No. 162 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T